Comments on: Social Media Spam and Parasite Hosting

By: Dario M.

Dario M. — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:54:16 +0000

huh?

By: bob

bob — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:44:55 +0000

IvynVy hi nice site thx http://peace.com

By: bob

bob — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:48:15 +0000

1MyssY hi great site thx http://peace.com

By: Daniel

Daniel — Sat, 04 Aug 2007 08:34:21 +0000

<<spam comment deleted>>

By: Bruce Dearborn Walker

Bruce Dearborn Walker — Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:21:54 +0000

Even though I understood what was written, had I not seen the two spam articles in question I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t have known why this article was posted. The writing was clear enough, but more context would have helped. And if one or two people wrote, you can be sure another hundred or two, at least, were mystified but passed on without comment.

I figured that since it was on Reddit it had to be legit, even though it bore all the hallmarks of spam. Interesting to see how it was pushed through. Thanks.

By: Arantius

Arantius — Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:03:07 +0000

Rabbit, I disagree completely. It’s the “I don’t understand, spoon feed me!” attitude that prevents learning. Some simple research and effort would explain this article for anyone who doesn’t already understand it.

Or, in other words, learning.

By: Rabbit

Rabbit — Sun, 22 Jul 2007 20:58:05 +0000

It’s attitudes like Alex’s, Dracula and Greg that make it difficult for people who don’t already know to learn. I see your type all the time on places like b.net and WoW. Instead of being jerks, try helping someone out. Who knows, you might enjoy it.

By: Alex

Alex — Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:05:28 +0000

Steve Bildermann, you are an idiot.

By: brett

brett — Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:54:31 +0000

Sorry if the article was a little unclear, Steve… I was writing it for an SEO-savvy audience and included some technical acronyms and some cryptic humor.

By: Jay

Jay — Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:54:01 +0000

Huh?