<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Lawsuits to Remove Negative Content Often Backfire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinereputationedge.com/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinereputationedge.com/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire</link>
	<description>Online Reputation Management Blog ~ .::Cutting-edge Insights::.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:12:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Online Impersonation: How to Defend Against It</title>
		<link>http://onlinereputationedge.com/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire/comment-page-1#comment-11351</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Impersonation: How to Defend Against It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-11351</guid>
		<description>[...] you may have grounds to threaten or file a lawsuit to mandate content removal or a cash settlement. Lawsuits often create additional animosity, so only do this is a last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you may have grounds to threaten or file a lawsuit to mandate content removal or a cash settlement. Lawsuits often create additional animosity, so only do this is a last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: backfire - StartTags.com</title>
		<link>http://onlinereputationedge.com/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire/comment-page-1#comment-11330</link>
		<dc:creator>backfire - StartTags.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-11330</guid>
		<description>[...] if you&#039;re considering ... then you might want to think again, on account of it not being quite ...Online Defamation Lawsuits: Usually a Bad IdeaAn article explaining the perils of litigation that ends up creating more negative content. ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if you&#39;re considering &#8230; then you might want to think again, on account of it not being quite &#8230;Online Defamation Lawsuits: Usually a Bad IdeaAn article explaining the perils of litigation that ends up creating more negative content. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal Admiral</title>
		<link>http://onlinereputationedge.com/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire/comment-page-1#comment-11301</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Admiral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-11301</guid>
		<description>Very good post! Like the points you make, but I think there are two things: 1. In the US this happens far more &amp; faster than in Europe for example. Lawyers see money in everything, they are almost next to your bed in the hospital when waking up after a crash for example. 2. Due to 1, it is far more easier to have it done by a 3rd party, than to do it yourself. In all, I completely agree with only sewing when really needed, and in your example this was not the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good post! Like the points you make, but I think there are two things: 1. In the US this happens far more &#038; faster than in Europe for example. Lawyers see money in everything, they are almost next to your bed in the hospital when waking up after a crash for example. 2. Due to 1, it is far more easier to have it done by a 3rd party, than to do it yourself. In all, I completely agree with only sewing when really needed, and in your example this was not the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Remove Negative Posts &#38; Links</title>
		<link>http://onlinereputationedge.com/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire/comment-page-1#comment-10999</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Remove Negative Posts &#38; Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-10999</guid>
		<description>[...] a case and actually plan on following through with it, if necessary. Many times, I&#8217;ve seen legal threats backfire and make the situation flare up much worse. Threats of litigation bring out a harsh and unforgiving [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a case and actually plan on following through with it, if necessary. Many times, I&#8217;ve seen legal threats backfire and make the situation flare up much worse. Threats of litigation bring out a harsh and unforgiving [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Dental Marketing Articles: Banish Disparaging Remarks About Your Practice &#124; The SEM Firm</title>
		<link>http://onlinereputationedge.com/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire/comment-page-1#comment-8643</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Dental Marketing Articles: Banish Disparaging Remarks About Your Practice &#124; The SEM Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-8643</guid>
		<description>[...] In rare cases you can contact an attorney and bring a suit against the defamatory website but many times these suits backfire. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In rare cases you can contact an attorney and bring a suit against the defamatory website but many times these suits backfire. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roz rambach</title>
		<link>http://onlinereputationedge.com/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire/comment-page-1#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>roz rambach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>Excellent post!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Allsopp</title>
		<link>http://onlinereputationedge.com/why-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-often-backfire/comment-page-1#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Allsopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copybrighter.com/blog/how-lawsuits-to-remove-negative-content-usually-backfire#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>You make some great points here Brett, good work. I am fully behind using lawsuits only when absolutely necessary but try to stay clear 99% of the time as there&#039;s probably a better work around.

Good to see you blogging again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some great points here Brett, good work. I am fully behind using lawsuits only when absolutely necessary but try to stay clear 99% of the time as there&#8217;s probably a better work around.</p>
<p>Good to see you blogging again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
